WSJ Says Mortgage Rates May Be At Their Lowest

According to an article in today's Wall Street Journal, mortgage rates may not go any lower, confounding many borrowers' hope that they will go lower and lower.

Take a look at the article below:


By JAMES R. HAGERTY

The Federal Reserve is going to extraordinary lengths to push down long-term interest rates, including home-mortgage rates. But those hoping mortgage rates will fall sharply from current levels, already historically low, may be disappointed.

Mortgage firms Thursday were quoting rates averaging 4.75% on 30-year fixed-rate mortgages, according to Zillow.com, a real-estate information service. That is down from more than 5% two days ago and about 6% in mid-November. But further big declines will be hard to achieve, partly because the mortgage-lending market has grown less competitive in the past year as hundreds of small banks and independent mortgage lenders have collapsed. The big banks that dominate the market are eager to boost their profits margins, not give deeper bargains to consumers.
Rates for borrowers with the strongest credit are likely to be in a range of roughly 4.5% to 4.75% for the rest of this year, says Mahesh Swaminathan, a mortgage strategist at Credit Suisse in New York.

Others say that is too optimistic. Assuming no big change in government policy, Walter Schmidt, an analyst at FTN Financial Capital Markets, sees a range of 4.75% to 5.5% for most of this year.
The Fed began driving mortgage rates down in late November when it announced plans to buy as much as $500 billion of mortgage securities this year. On Wednesday, the Fed expanded that program, saying it will spend as much as $1.25 trillion on such securities in 2009. That is enough to provide funding for more than half of all home-mortgage loans likely to be made in the U.S. this year.

The Fed also is buying long-term Treasury bonds to drive down rates on those securities, whose pricing affects mortgage rates.

By historical standards, rates look incredibly low. Until recently, 30-year fixed-rate mortgages hadn't been below 5% since the 1950s. For the past couple of months, rates have been bobbing between about 5% and 5.25%. The 30-year rate averaged 4.98% in the week ended March 19, down from 5.03% the prior week, according to Freddie Mac's survey. Fifteen-year fixed-rate mortgages averaged 4.61%, down from 4.64%.
One reason mortgage rates often tick back up after a decline is that a rush of people seeking to refinance quickly causes backlogs at lenders, which frequently don't have enough employees to process all of the applications.

"If lenders are working people overtime to close loans, they don't have an incentive to compete too hard on price," says Arthur Frank, who heads research on mortgage securities at Deutsche Bank in New York.

The situation highlights a conundrum for the government. It wants low rates to spur the housing market, but also wants the banks to make profits on loans so they can return to financial health.
Many of the small mortgage banks that remain are struggling. Mortgage banks, often small, family-owned companies, aren't licensed to take deposits and so lack that source of money for their loans. Instead, they typically borrow money for short periods from so-called warehouse lenders. They use this short-term credit to make loans to their customers and then pay back the warehouse lenders after selling the loans to bigger banks or to government-backed mortgage investors Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

But this warehouse credit is much harder to obtain than it was a year or two ago because many of the big banks and Wall Street firms that used to provide it have exited that business.
Despite these constraints, the Fed's action is "going to be a plus" for the housing market, says Thomas Lawler, an economist in Leesburg, Va. Lower rates make it more likely that home prices will hit bottom in many parts of the country later this year, Mr. Lawler says. The recovery, though, is likely to be gradual, partly because rising unemployment reduces housing demand.
Christopher J. Mayer, a real-estate professor at Columbia Business School in New York, says the Fed's moves to cut rates are "helping to put a floor under the housing market." But he worries that the Fed could face huge losses on the mortgage securities if inflation fears eventually push interest rates much higher.

Still, the consumers who need these low rates the most aren't likely to get much help. Many people can't qualify for these low rates because their credit scores aren't high enough or they can't afford a down payment of 20% or more on a home purchase. Such people will be socked with fees that can drive up their housing costs considerably. Banks also have become far pickier about appraisals and are nixing many purchases as a result.

Others can't qualify for a refinancing because they owe far more on their homes than the estimated current market values. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have new refinancing programs that will let some borrowers refinance into lower rates even if they owe as much as 105% of the home value, but only for current loans owned or guaranteed by Fannie or Freddie.

Write to James R. Hagerty at bob.hagerty@wsj.com

Printed in The Wall Street Journal, page C1

Meet the Feds

FED TO BUY ADDITIONAL $750 BLN OF MBS, $100 BLN OF GSE DEBT
FED LEAVES TARGET INTEREST-RATE RANGE UNCHANGED AT 0% TO 0.25%
FED TO PURCHASE UP TO $300 BLN OF LONGER-TERM TREASURIES
FED SAYS INFLATION MAY PERSIST BELOW `BEST' LEVEL
FED SAYS NEAR-TERM ECONOMIC OUTLOOK IS `WEAK'
FED SEES `EXCEPTIONALLY LOW' FUNDS RATE FOR `EXTENDED' PERIOD
FED TO CONTINUE MONITORING BALANCE SHEET SIZE, COMPOSITION
FED VOTE ON MONETARY POLICY IS UNANIMOUS *FED SAYS ECONOMY `CONTINUES TO CONTRACT'
FED TO BUY TOTAL OF UP TO $1.25 TRILLION OF AGENCY MBS IN 2009
FED TO BUY TOTAL OF UP TO $200 BLN OF GSE DEBT IN 2009
FED SAYS TALF TO EXPAND TO INCLUDE OTHER `FINANCIAL ASSETS'
FED SAYS INFLATION WILL REMAIN SUBDUED *FED TO USE `ALL AVAILABLE TOOLS' TO HELP ECONOMY RECOVER

Looks like rates are going lower...

Is Mitt Romney a Racist?

The other day on MSNBC's Morning Joe, Governor Romney continually called the President by his first and last names instead of addressing the office. Instead of saying President Obama, he kept saying "Barak Obama." Even going so far as to call the President by his first name one time.

Is this because Governor Romney is a racist, or because he doesn't believe in our electoral politics?

Rush Limbaugh Wants This Country to Fail

I think Mr. Limbaugh's statements at a political event, are indicative of the Republican Party these days. They'd rather see the President's policies fail so that they can win an election to regain power than do something for this country.

Pathetic. I'd rather both parties try their best to make this country great than spend all of their time setting each other up for failure.